All guides

Workflows

Competitive intelligence for product marketing that stays close to the market

Product marketing becomes the translation layer: public market evidence enters; positioning, enablement and launch decisions come out.

Rivexa Research8 min read

Build the baseline around buyer decisions

For each priority competitor, capture audience, problem, promise, proof, packaging and common sales objection. Add the source and review date to every claim. This creates a baseline the team can update without starting from memory.

Connect market signals to artifacts

A positioning change should trigger a messaging review. A pricing change should reach the pricing comparison and affected battlecard. A launch should update the relevant objection response and roadmap context.

Name these routes in advance. Otherwise useful findings remain in a feed while customer-facing material becomes stale.

Close the loop with sales and product

Public evidence shows what competitors publish. Sales reveals which claims enter deals; product reveals whether the claim changes customer expectations. Review the three perspectives together.

Record contradictions. If a website emphasizes enterprise but deals remain small-business, the gap is useful intelligence.

Measure freshness and use

Track the age of claims, battlecard usage, deal questions answered and decisions influenced. Avoid reporting the number of links collected as the program’s primary outcome.

Working checklist

Use this in the next review.

  • Maintain a dated positioning and packaging baseline.
  • Map signal categories to owned artifacts.
  • Bring sales and product evidence into review.
  • Keep contradictions rather than forcing consensus.
  • Measure freshness, usage and decisions influenced.

Your first brief starts here

Turn public change into a decision-ready brief.

Start monitoring

Set up in two minutes. First brief tomorrow morning.